Development of a Metaliteracy Course for Online Ed.D. Students and Beyond

Metaliteracy, as introduced by Mackey and Jacobson in 2011, has been instrumental in developing metaliterate learners in a variety of contexts. The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, published in 2016, transformed the previous Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (ACRL, 2000) into frames that build upon each other and were not prescriptive in how to assess students’ learning. Many librarians turn to the Framework as a guideline for developing information literacy courses, tutorials, guided studies, and assessments. Libraries and librarians create assessments of the Framework that are varied and individualized.

Using the Framework in conjunction with metaliteracy goals and learning objectives can enhance the student experience as well as give librarians a standard to follow that ensures development of skills needed in a participatory, connected environment (Mackey & Jacobson, 2011). Notes that reference metaliteracy and metacognition can be found in the Framework (2016). The Framework does have its strengths, but incorporating metaliteracy goals and learning objectives into the frames can aid in assessment and add to the knowledge and skills students should develop throughout their lifetime, not just when they are participating in higher education.

Using the original set of metaliteracy goals and learning objectives found on metaliteracy.org (Forte, et al, 2014), a metaliteracy course was developed in the Learning Management System (LMS) Canvas, specifically for fully online Ed.D. students, preparing them for research-related content encountered in their courses (Atkinson, 2019). The original course by Atkinson (2019) compared pretest, posttest, and metacognitive skills, using the Metacognitive Strategies for Library Research Skills Scale (MS-LRSS) developed by Catalano (2017). 

The course was designed using backward design methods (Wiggins & McTighe, 2006) to introduce online doctoral students to common library terminology, metaliteracy, and metacognitive concepts. The metaliteracy course was not intended to take the place of library tutorials, individualized instruction, or research consultations–all of which are critical to meet the needs of doctoral students in an online environment.

The metaliteracy course consists of five modules, four of which are directly related to the metaliteracy goals and learning objectives from 2014 (Forte, et. al., 2014). The fifth module relates to specific skills students need to be successful, particularly in the Ed.D. program such as requesting materials through InterLibrary Loan, identifying research methods, and recognizing specific library databases. Each module consists of a pretest, an overview and videos (most of which are three minutes or less), and a posttest. Each module name, the video titles, and learning objectives are listed below.

Module 1: Evaluate Content Critically
Two Videos: Scholarly Resources; Peer Review

Objective: Metaliterate learners evaluate information critically by determining authority, relevancy, accuracy, and validity of each source regardless of the information’s delivery method.

By the end of this module, learners will be able to:

1) Recognize the criteria for evaluating authority, relevancy, accuracy, and validity of information sources

2) Determine context of an information source by considering purpose and format

3) Distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly sources

4) Understand the process of peer review and its purpose in scholarly research

Module 2: Information Ethics

Two Videos: Academic Integrity, Copyright, and Plagiarism; APA Style

Objective: Metaliterate learners understand and differentiate between their own intellectual property and others’ intellectual property, and give credit to others’ work using proper citation style methods.

By the end of this module, learners will be able to:

1) Understand the concepts of academic integrity, copyright, and plagiarism

2) Differentiate between various forms of attribution

3) Identify parts of a citation in APA style

4) Recognize elements of APA style in context

Module 3: Information Creation, Sharing, and Collaboration

Three videos: Social Media; Digital and Visual Literacy; Creating Original Content

Objective: Metaliterate learners are aware of their online environments, participate collaboratively, transfer information from one format to another, and produce and share original content.

By the end of this module, learners will be able to:

1) Understand the various ways of sharing original content

2) Consciously participate in social media environments

3) Describe digital and visual literacy and their importance to metaliterate learning

4) Identify digital and media formats and the uses and purposes of each

Module 4: Lifelong Learning Research Strategies

Two videos: Information Needs; Metacognition

Objective: Metaliterate learners connect learning with personal, professional, and lifelong goals using their experiences. Metaliterate learners recognize metacognitive principles of learning by acknowledging that learning is a process and can reflect on research difficulties to improve strategies.

By the end of this module, learners will be able to:

1) Know which search strategies are appropriate for the information needs

2) Determine tasks involved to develop research questions

3) Reflect on one’s own knowledge and determine ways to increase metacognition skills

4) Recognize the process of critical thinking that leads to metaliterate learning

Module 5: Research Skills Proficiency

Three videos: Types of Sources; Requesting Materials and ILL; Research Methods

Objective: Metaliterate learners are proficient in distinguishing between types of sources, describing research methods, and understanding how to request materials to find relevant, scholarly, and authoritative information sources.

By the end of this module, learners will be able to:

1) Describe research methods, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods

2) Distinguish between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources

3) Recognize ACU library’s databases, authentication process, and InterLibrary Loan procedures

4) Understand how to request physical materials

The original course has been modified to reach other fully online student audiences such as undergraduate students and Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) students. The undergraduate metaliteracy course is embedded in a critical thinking course that is taken by all online undergraduates. The program directors for the Ed.D. and DNP programs encourage students to self-enroll in the Canvas metaliteracy course specifically designed for those students in each program. Currently, a LibGuide is being developed to bring the metaliteracy course to a wider audience than is currently reached in Canvas. The full metaliteracy course will be available at this link (forthcoming), https://guides.acu.edu/metaliteracy, and currently includes all of the learning objectives and videos for each module.

A mapping of the ACRL Framework to the metaliteracy course objectives can help expand the knowledge and skills students need to succeed in their courses and beyond. The concept of metaliteracy is important for either an introduction for undergraduate students to library and research terminology or for graduate and doctoral students who already have these concepts developed as well as students who have not been to school for a long time and need a refresher on these concepts. Future plans include updating the metaliteracy course to incorporate the updated metaliteracy goals and learning objectives from 2018 (Jacobson, et al, 2018) as well as an update to the mapping of the Framework.

References

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved September 29, 2023, from https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/7668

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved September 29, 2023, from https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Atkinson, M. D. (2019). The relationship between metaliteracy pretest, posttest, and Metacognitive Strategies for Library Research Skills Scale: Creating a metaliteracy course for online Ed.D. students [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University]. https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/library_pub/32

Catalano, A. A. (2017). Development and validation of the Metacognitive Strategies for Library Research Skills Scale (MS-LRSS). Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2017.02.017

Forte, M., Jacobson, T., Mackey, T.,  O’Keeffe, E., & Stone, K. (2014). 2014 Metaliteracy Goals and Learning Objectives. Retrieved September 29, 2023, from https://metaliteracy.org/learning-objectives/2014-metaliteracy-goals-and-learning-objectives/.

Fulkerson, D. M., Ariew, S. A., & Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Revisiting metacognition and metaliteracy in the ACRL Framework. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45

Jacobson, T., Mackey, T., O’Brien, K., Forte, M., & O’Keeffe, E. (2018). 2018 Metaliteracy Goals and Learning Objectives. Retrieved September 29, 2023, from https://metaliteracy.org/learning-objectives/2018-metaliteracy-goals-and-learning-objectives/

Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2006). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Pearson.

1 thought on “Development of a Metaliteracy Course for Online Ed.D. Students and Beyond

Leave a comment