## DIGA-4999 Capstone: Project Evaluation & Peer Review Form

Student Name:
Project Title:
Reviewer:
Date:

Callout

Scoring Key

10–9: Excellent
8–7: Good
6–5: Satisfactory
4–1: Needs Improvement

### 1. Creative Concept & Originality

Excellent (10–9): Highly original, compelling, and well-developed concept with a strong artistic vision.

Good (8–7): Creative and clear with some originality and thoughtful development.

Satisfactory (6–5): Concept shows effort but is limited in originality, depth, or focus.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Underdeveloped or derivative concept; lacks clarity or creativity.

Score: ________

### 2. Technical Execution & Tool Mastery

Excellent (10–9): Flawless, polished execution with professional tool use and craftsmanship.

Good (8–7): Competently executed with minor flaws; tools used effectively.

Satisfactory (6–5): Basic technical proficiency; issues are noticeable but not project-breaking.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Major technical flaws; weak or inconsistent tool use.

Score: ________

### 3. Pre-Production Planning & Documentation

Excellent (10–9): Planning materials are thorough, clear, aligned with the final work, and professionally presented.

Good (8–7): Mostly complete documentation that supports execution.

Satisfactory (6–5): Inconsistent or partial documentation; limited impact on project development.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Planning is missing, unclear, or insufficient for production support.

Score: ________

### 4. Medium & Genre Integration

Excellent (10–9): Seamless integration of genre(s) and medium that enhances creative intent.

Good (8–7): Coherent use of medium and genre; contributes well to overall vision.

Satisfactory (6–5): Basic application of medium/genre; limited synergy between them.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Poor integration; medium and genre feel disconnected or unjustified.

Score: ________

### 5. Usability & User Experience

Excellent (10–9): Highly intuitive, responsive, and user-centered experience.

Good (8–7): Generally usable; minor friction points may exist.

Satisfactory (6–5): Usability issues that impact flow or comprehension.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Difficult to navigate or interact with; usability impairs engagement.

Score: ________

### 6. Accessibility & Inclusive Design

Excellent (10–9): Fully accessible (alt text, captions, color contrast, keyboard navigation, etc.).

Good (8–7): Mostly accessible with minor gaps or inconsistencies.

Satisfactory (6–5): Some accessibility features present but not fully applied.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Lacks sufficient attention to accessibility and inclusion.

Score: ________

### 7. Ethical Awareness & Reflection

Excellent (10–9): Strong ethical reasoning integrated into all aspects of design and representation.

Good (8–7): Ethical considerations addressed with reasonable consistency.

Satisfactory (6–5): Ethical thinking is present but limited in depth or application.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Ethics not addressed, or problematic content left unexamined.

Score: ________

### 8. AI Use & Documentation

Excellent (10–9): Transparent, thoughtful, and creative use of AI tools with full documentation.

Good (8–7): Appropriate and documented AI use with some reflection.

Satisfactory (6–5): Limited documentation of AI use; unclear ethical framing.

Needs Improvement (4–1): AI use is undocumented or inappropriate; lacks reflection.

Score: ________

### 9. Presentation & Communication

Excellent (10–9): Engaging, clear, and professional; enhances understanding and delivery.

Good (8–7): Clear and structured; minor delivery issues.

Satisfactory (6–5): Presentation is functional but lacks polish or engagement.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Unclear, disorganized, or poorly delivered.

Score: ________

### 10. Reflection & Self-Evaluation

Excellent (10–9): Insightful, critical reflection on learning and future direction.

Good (8–7): Thoughtful reflection with good self-awareness.

Satisfactory (6–5): Basic reflection with minimal depth.

Needs Improvement (4–1): Little to no reflection evident.

Score: ________

TOTAL SCORE (out of 100): ________ / 100

## Reviewer Comments

### Strengths:

#### Suggestions for Improvement:

## Peer Feedback Summary

### (150–200 words)

Reflect on the feedback you received or provided. How might it inform revisions? Include any questions or uncertainties you’d like discussed with peers or the instructor.

Callout

Instructions for Peer Reviewers

1. Please be kind, thoughtful and genuine in your responses
2. Use honest, constructive criticism.
3. Focus on both strengths and specific recommendations.
4. Submit on time so that reviewers have actionable feedback before final revisions.